Pure logic, according to Ernest Nagel (and James Newman) at least. In the classic book on Gödel's theorem the following example appears:
Where g stands for gentlemen, p for polite, and b for bankers, with the bar on top meaning not. So gentlemen are contained in polite, bankers are contained in not-polite, so it follows that gentlemen are contained in not-bankers. Of course you can substitute polite with other epithets. But they got it right. As I said, it's pure logic.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Keynes’ denial of conflict: a reply to Professor Heise’s critique
Tom Palley reply to response about his paper on Keynes lack of understanding of class conflict. In many ways, this is how Tom discusses Ke...
-
"Where is Everybody?" The blog will continue here for announcements, messages and links to more substantive pieces. But those will...
-
There are Gold Bugs and there are Bitcoin Bugs. They all oppose fiat money (hate the Fed and other monetary authorities) and follow some s...
-
Javier Milei will be Argentina’s next president. Milei is an extreme right-wing populist, with authoritarian, some may say Fascistic, tenden...
QED!
ReplyDeleteThe logic is wrong.
ReplyDeleteConsider the follow and tell me where the trick is:
Aristotle=Man
Aristotle=X
Ergo
Man=X
But that is only true if X=mortal; not if X=Greek
Regards.